Just another onMason weblog

How might I begin a self-study of teaching?


Colleagues tell me they find this article written by myself and an English teacher to be quite useful in launching their self-study of teaching so I thought to post it here for you. Libbie presents a wonderful exemplar of the benefits of studying her teaching for herself professionally but especially for her students. (See full reference below and please excuse format of copy.)

Samaras, A. P., & Roberts, L. (2011). Flying solo: Teachers take charge of their learning through self-study research. Learning Forward, Journal of Staff Development, 32(5), 42-45.



By Anastasia Samaras and Libbie Roberts

Change begins from the inside. As Daniel Pink (2009) says, intrinsic motiva- tion and drive come from autonomy, mastery, and purpose. Successful re- form efforts originate from the ground up. Teachers are growing increasingly frustrated with an educational system that they perceive they are powerless to change. However, teachers are not powerless: The one thing teachers know they can change is themselves. What might happen if teachers are asked to choose to study their own dilemmas of practice in an effort to close their students’ achievement gaps?

While there has been much discussion about teacher quality and its importance, there has been little conversation about how teachers are motivated to improve the quality of their own practice in order to improve student learning. Teachers are, after all, the direct players, the ones we want to be highly qualified, the ones who are held responsible for improving student learning while attempting to address a flood of standards. How are teachers encouraged to take charge of their professional development to improve the quality of their teaching and close their own achievement gaps?

Teachers, like students, are motivated to learn about things they care about and that matter to their lives. They are motivated about reforms that have instant applicability to their teaching and their students’ learning. The best re- forms may be initiated when teachers pose purposeful and applicable questions about their practice that empower a reform change in the first person. This cutting-edge para- digm is known as the self-study school of thought (Samaras & Freese 2006). Imagine if teachers were given these prompts:

  1. What question do I most wonder about in my teaching practice?
  2. What causes me to wonder about this question?
  3. Why is this question important to me? What experi ences and perspectives brought me to ask this question?
  4. Who would benefit from addressing this question (e.g. me, my students, my school, a school division, society at large)?


Self-study teacher research is designed to encourage teachers to be agents of their own reform initiatives while working collaboratively with school colleagues. It has proven useful to an array of educators coming from multiple disciplines and programs (Kosnik, Beck, Freese, & Samaras 2006). In self-study, teachers critically examine their actions and the context of those actions as a way of developing a more consciously driven mode of professional activity, as contrasted with action based on habit, tradition, or impulse. Self-study allows teachers to plan, enact, and assess their pedagogical strategies with the support and critique of professional colleagues while examining the impact of their efforts on student learning. Although self-study is a recursive process, the following steps provide guidelines for teachers who are new to self-study research (Samaras, 2011).


STEP 1: Author  your own question.

Self-study teachers initiate questions about their own practice, which they generate from observations of and personal experiences within their classrooms. The tensions teachers choose to examine are opportunities for professional growth and learning.

STEP 2: Work with a critical friends team.

Self-study requires critical collaborative inquiry. Self-study teachers work with critical friends in an intellectually  safe and supportive community to improve their practice by making it explicit to themselves and to others through critical collaborative inquiries. Self-study is personal and interpersonal with learning, thinking, and knowing arising through collaboration and feedback from others. Working with colleagues helps extend and transform an individual’s understanding. Critical friends encourage and solicit respectful questioning and divergent views to obtain alternative perspectives, and they work to help validate the quality and legitimacy of each other’s claims.

STEP 3: Plan new pedagogies for improved learning.

The purpose of self-study is improved learning. Teachers must ask, “What is the value of this research to others?” This deliberate questioning leads to improved teaching to impact student learning. Improved learning includes teachers’ under- standing of what works and what doesn’t work in their teaching. What if a teacher’s research does not result in hoped-for outcomes? Teachers, like all learners, learn from their mistakes. In their research efforts, teachers are learning what works and what doesn’t work, and that is progress.

STEP 4: Enact, document, and assess your research process.

Self-study requires a transparent research process that clearly and accurately documents the process through dialogue and critique with col- leagues. It necessitates that teachers are open to outside views, questions, and critique. Self-study teachers strive to make their practice explicit to themselves, as well as to others. Critical friends who ask probing questions and offer alternative perspectives and interpretations enhance the transparency of the research process.

STEP 5: Generate and share what you learned.

Making a study public allows it to be available for review and critique.

Self-study research generates knowledge that is made public through presentation and publication. Making a study public to understand the five steps of a successful study and to see evidence that the self-study teacher research resulted in reformed instruction that in turn benefited students. Making a study public, allows it to be available for review and critique. It contributes to the accumulation of pedagogical, content, and issue-based knowledge and serves to build validation across related work.


What is the value of a self-study like the one described here. I was my own critic, and, as a result, I have a new understanding of the value and professional ethics of consciously examining my teaching practices.

Who benefits from addressing this question? Often the questions teachers raise challenge their own ways of doing things. In turn, that classroom questioning is set within the larger context of their school. Not only did the teacher reframe her thinking about student choice in a writ-ing assignment, but she rethought her attitude about students’ abilities. Her students are more interested in writing, and her colleagues are curious about implementing similar pedagogies in their classrooms. On an individual and collective level, teachers can generate new practices that improve their professional development and contribute to the knowledge base of quality in teaching. Those new practices can be generated through the self-study process.


The five steps of self-study teacher research can make a difference in learning. See the article above for an example of self-study research in ac- tion. Explore excerpts from one teacher’s project

Libbie Roberts: A teacher’s self-study project

STEP 1: Author  your own question.

I teach 9th-grade English in a public high school with a diverse population of students from 42 countries who speak 34 languages. Ten percent of our students are enrolled in English for Speakers of Other Languages and 12% of our students are enrolled in special education. Overall, 25% of our students have limited English proficiency, and 39% of our students receive free or reduced lunch.

As part of the English 9 curriculum, students must write a formal research pa- per. Students engage in research constantly, but there is little resemblance between the research in their real lives and the formal re-search paper that my colleagues and I feel bound to teach by the state standards. I was interested in ways to make the unit and the paper more authentic to students’ learn- ing while still meeting the standards. In authoring my self-study question, I asked, “How can I design my instruction to assist students in gathering adequate information about their research topic to write a well-developed paper that is personally meaningful to them?”

STEP 2: Work with a critical friends team.

For the research project, I collaborated with two librarians from my school and two critical friends from my university class. Unexpected insights came out of our collaboration. With my colleagues, I revamped the assignment to make it more relevant to students’ lives. We abandoned topics I had previously assigned to students and designed an open-choice assignment. We asked: What do people in the real world do when they want to learn about something? That is when we realized we had made the students’ research experience less authentic, not only by mandat-ing the topics, but by assigning the paper up front. We had also complicated the situation by teaching about plagiarism, citations, and note taking before allowing the students to browse, question, wonder, and research. We realized this approach caused students to dread rather than look forward to researching a topic. The students went into the library not to read and learn, but to find enough information to fill out the required number of note cards. Our theory that increasing student engagement and making the process more authentic would result in better papers proved true, and my students had more success than they had before with research papers. The process of engaging with other teachers in critical inquiry allowed me to discover solutions I would not have arrived at on my own.

STEP 3: Plan new pedagogies for improved learning.

My efforts resulted in meaningful student research and greater motivation, particularly for students who struggled to take owner- ship of their learning. My students’ improved work gave me tangible proof that it is possible to teach state standards in a manner that allows for student choice and creativity. It does not have to be one or the other. I am excited to go back to the drawing board and look at other ways that I can reignite my teaching by emphasizing student choice. The process of engaging in self-study has recon- firmed the value of taking time to reflect on my teaching and to actively seek solutions and alternative ideas. During this process, I was my own critic, and, as a result, I have a new understanding of the value and professional ethics of consciously examining my teaching practices.


STEP 4: Enact, document, and assess your research process.

I used various pedagogical strategies to tap into my students’ research interests. I surveyed the students, asked them to share their ideas with their class peers, and provided time for them to research subtopics to help them focus on a question. My multiple and varied data sources included 11 data collection instruments: student interest survey; brainstorming  activities; teacher reflective journal entries; reading days; time samples; critical friends memos; student surveys after reading days; student outlines; student note cards; librarian questionnaire; and observations using the librarian questionnaire. Each data instrument offered me a way to better see students’ learning needs.


STEP 5: Generate and share what you learned.

I was convinced that the changes I made in teaching this 9th- grade research unit resulted in more meaningful learning for my students. My students were able to master all of the essential state- required skills more easily than in years past. As I went into to this project, I was aware that my method of teaching the research unit did not align with my values of a student-centered classroom. Now I have introduced student choice and provided opportunities for students to conduct authentic research.

The motivation and success of my students during a unit that admittedly has little resemblance to real-life research adds further evidence that student choice facilitates learning. An important aspect of authentic learning is making the reading and research in our classes relevant to our students’ lives and experiences. If we do that, our students will agree to learn things they perceive as less valuable, like putting the period after the parenthesis.



After several weeks of brainstorming, journaling, and confer encing, students had decided on their topics and were looking for their first book source. A new student, Diane, was suddenly transferred into my class. She is a 20-year-old Latino student coming to English 9 from the ESOL program. She is also the mother of a 2-year-old daughter. I was a bit distressed to discover her sudden transfer, not because I did not welcome her, but rather because it was the last period of the day in the middle of a challenging situ- ation. As I was getting the other students started, I quickly sum marized the project for her. I said, “Look, we’re going to be doing research on something that interests us. So, while the students are looking for their books today, I want you to sit down and make a list of everything you think you may want to learn about. What would you like to learn to do?”

Later in the period, after the students had found books and settled down to read, I checked in with Diane. I was amazed to see that her paper was covered. She had a long list of things she wanted to learn about, and she had two themes: How to do well in school and graduate, and how to be a good mom. She decided to investigate how to be a good mom. We went to the online catalog, she typed in her topic, and within minutes, she was browsing the shelves. I was struck by how different this experience would have been for her last year, when she would have been sitting at the table with note cards answering questions about an assigned topic that had nothing to do with her life and would in no way benefit her daughter.

— Libbie Roberts




Kosnik, C., Beck, C., Freese, A.R., & Samaras, A.P. (Eds.). (2006). Making a difference in teacher education through self-study: Studies of personal, professional, and program renewal. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Pink, D. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Penguin Group.

Samaras, A.P. (2011). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Samaras, A.P., & Freese, A.R. (2006). Self-study of teaching practices. New York: Peter Lang.

Anastasia Samaras (asamaras@gmu.edu) is professor of education at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va. Libbie Roberts (ljroberts1@fcps.edu) teaches 9th-grade English at Robert E. Lee High School in Springfield, Va. ■

How can art help you understand your research?


See this work by Kavita Mittapalli who used the arts to think deeply about her identity as a mixed methods researcher.


Mittapalli, K., & Samaras, A. P. (2008). Madhubani Art: A journey of an education researcher seeking self-development answers through art and self-study. The Qualitative Report, 13(2), 244-261.

and here’s her work in program evaluation in schools


Collective Self-Study with Faculty and Doc Students

Here’s an example of how self-study methodology is useful for studying how to improve teacher education programs  and with a focus on improving the quality of students’ clinical experiences.

Samaras, A. P., Frank, T., Apollon Williams, M., Christopher, E., Rodick, W. H. (In Press). A collective self-study to improve program coherence of clinical experiences. Studying Teacher Education.

FREE Copy available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/hY9ehgiBdFJV2h64zJ5S/full

A Collective Self-Study to Improve Program Coherence of Clinical ExperiencesUn self-study colectivo para la mejora en la coherencia de un programa en sus experiencias clínicas

Multidisciplinary Self-Study of Teaching

Multidisciplinary Self-Study of Teaching Goes to Korea

What happens when you gather a group of faculty from various disciplines to study their teaching practice? That’s exactly what Anastasia Samaras, a pedagogical scholar and self-study research methodologist from the College of Education and Human Development at George Mason University, did at the Mason Korea campus and also at four other universities in Korea during her awarded spring study leave.

Regardless of discipline, instructors have the common goal of advancing their teaching to improve student learning and students are the center of George Mason University. Since Mason Korea is a relatively new campus, faculty are as some noted, “a program of one” so many instructors were eager to collect around their common goal of improving their teaching. Professor Samaras’ visit, sponsored by Mason Korea, included interactive workshops and individual consultations over a week long period. The initiative holds the potential to seed possibilities for a professional learning community with faculty reciprocal learning as “critical friends”.

IMG_2548Samaras’ work at Mason Korea builds on earlier transdisciplinary self-study teaching/research projects which she has led and co-facilitated at George Mason Fairfax since 2010 spearheaded by the Center for Faculty and Teaching Excellence. She currently serves as a co-facilitator of a third faculty development cohort, Self-Study Scholars’ Collaborative (S3C) on the Visually Rich Digital Learning Environment with Lynne Scott Constantine, School of Art, and Lesley Smith in Higher Education and College of Humanities and Social Sciences.

Samaras is also serving as Co-PI on two NSF sponsored grants as educational researcher and leading a faculty self-study Teacher Inquiry Group of STEM faculty.

These transdisciplinary projects not only demonstrate the pedagogic and academic value of self-study of teaching within communities of learning, but offer a unique avenue for faculty development and innovative productivity across numerous programs and Colleges and with a multiplier effect as the research and new pedagogies are presented and published in multiple and diverse venues. The projects highlight the importance of Mason campuses supporting and rewarding innovation and initiatives as a nexus of grassroots change and institutional renewal.

While in Korea, Samaras was also invited to give a series of keynote talks and workshops at universities. She spoke at Jeonnam National University, March 23; at Cheongju National University, March 24; at Seoul National University, March 25, and at Ewha Womans University, April 2.

IMG_2609There has been a keen interest in the self-study methodology by faculty at numerous universities in Korea with two of Samaras’ books (2006 & 2011) translated into Korean. In 2013, she was interviewed by a team of six Korean scholars; two were visiting scholars to GMU translating her 2011 book, Self-Study of Teacher Research. Their goal was to make available innovate teaching practices in a society moving towards more sociocultural pedagogical practices.

The translation team included: Dr. Chilseong Im, Korean Language Education, Jeonnam National University; Dr. Hyuk Suh, Department of Korean Language Education, Ehwa Womans University; Dr. Hee-Ok Jun, Social Studies Education, Education Research Institute, Cheongju National University; Dr. Young Jung, Coordinator of the GMU Korean Studies Program and Department of Modern and Classical Languages; Dr. Jin Choi, English Education Department, Jeonnam National University; and Dr. Hye Young Shin, GMU, Korean Language. They enthusiastically invited Samaras to speak at their universities and work with faculty, students, and teachers in self-study projects. Additionally, one of her earlier books, co-authored with Anne Freese (2006), Self-study of teaching practices primer, was also translated into Korean in 2013 by JeongAe You from Seoul National University and Suhak Oh from Inha University, Incheon, Korea.

Samaras’ work in self-study scholarship on an international has also included: a Fulbright Scholarship in 2012, where she worked with faculty at the University of Ioannina, Greece to explore self-study research for co-teachers, or special education teachers working with general education teachers. She also gave keynote addresses at Beijing Normal University in 2012, at the University of KwaZulu Natal in Durban in 2012 and 2014, and will speak at Hibernia College, Dublin in November.

IMG_0974For Samaras, her work in Korea provided an opportunity to enact, assess, and research her design of teaching and facilitating self-study which she has been conducting with self-study colleagues (Lunenberg & Samaras, 2014; Pithouse-Morgan & Samaras, 2014; Samaras 2013; Samaras, et al, 2015). As she remarks, “I’m still learning about my practice and am grateful for these professional opportunities with colleagues around the globe.”


Lunenberg, M., & Samaras, A. P. (2011). Developing a pedagogy for teaching self-study  research: Lessons learned across the Atlantic. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, (5), 841-850.

Pithouse-Morgan, K., & Samaras, A. P. (2014). Thinking in space: Learning about dialogue as method from a trans-continental conversation about trans-disciplinary self-study. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.). Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, East Sussex, England (167-170). Auckland, Australia: University of Auckland.

Samaras, A. P. (2013). Twelve Shells: Learning by leading cross-disciplinary faculty self-study of professional practice Reflective Practice, 14 (4), 519-535.

Samaras, A. P. (2011). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.   [Translated into Korean]

Samaras, A. P., & Freese, A. R. (2006).  Self-study of teaching practices primer. NY: Peter Lang.  [Translated into Korean]

Samaras, A. P., Karczmarczyk, D, Smith, L, Woodville, L, Harmon, L, Nasser, I., Parsons, S., Smith, T., Borne, K., Constantine, L., Roman Mendoza, E., Suh, J., & Swanson, R. (2014). The shark in the vitrine: Experiencing our practice from the inside out with transdisciplinary lenses. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(4), 368-388.

Samaras, A. P., Pithouse-Moragn, K., Chisange,T., Conllney, J., Constantine, L. S., Meyiwa, T, Smith, L., Meyiwa, T., & Timm, D. (2015). Breathing under water: A transcontinental conversation about co-facilitating self-study learning communities. In Pithouse-Morgan, K., & Samaras, A. P. (Eds.). Polyvocal professional learning through self-study research. (pp. 231-252). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.







Our new book on professional learning!

IMG_2976Polyvocal Professional Learning through Self-Study Research
Kathleen Pithouse-Morgan
University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Anastasia P. Samaras (Eds.)
George Mason University, USA

Sense Publishers, 2015

Polyvocal Professional Learning through Self-Study Research illustrates the power of “we” for innovative and authentic professional learning. The 33 contributors to this book include experienced and emerging self-study researchers, writing in collaboration, across multiple professions, academic disciplines, contexts, and continents. These authors have noted and reviewed each other’s chapters and adapted their contributions to generate a polyvocal conversation that significantly advances scholarship on professional learning through self-study research. Building on, and extending, the existing body of work on self-study research, the book offers an extensive and in-depth scholarly exploration of the how, why, and impact of professional learning through context-specific, practitioner-led inquiry. The chapters illustrate polyvocal professional learning as both phenomenon and method, with the original research that is presented in every chapter adding to the forms of methodological inventiveness that have been developed and documented within the self-study research community.

Please visit the book’s product page, which offers a free preview containing the first two chapters of the book: http://tinyurl.com/okaqlaq.

Latest research posted on LinkedIn and Research Gate

Summer greetings! If you are interested in my latest research, please visit me on LinkedIn and Research Gate.

Teacher Stayers and Teacher Leavers

Have you ever wondered why some teachers stay and others leave?

I heard this NPR show yesterday about teachers who left teaching and it appeared to be largely related to the fact that teaching is not viewed as a high status job. Teachers and their students notice this.

You can find the radio show at:


What might we do to change this? Does higher income equal higher status or is there another way? If you’re a teacher, why do you stay?


You might be interested in this dissertation:Sell, C. (2014). Teacher retention: A phenomenological investigation into the lived experience of three elementary teacher stayers. George Mason University, Virginia, Conferred, December, 2012.


Reflections of Self-Study Journeys 2012…We are each doing what we can because we so strongly believe in the work of teachers. That is my life-work. I strive to teach and inspire teachers to persevere despite the challenges we face. They inspire me. Learning is such a gift for us all! Click the “Reflections.SS.Journeys” below the picture to read about it.



Raise your hand if you went into teaching for the money

Why do people choose to teach? The truth is, none of us really went into teaching because of the big bucks. So why? I agree with Daniel Pink that teachers should be paid more but merit pay doesn’t work because we are motivated by things that merit pay doesn’t accomplish.

“Rewards are very effective for some things — simple things, mechanical things,” he explains. “But for complicated jobs that require judgment and creativity, the evidence shows that it just doesn’t work very well.” Teaching, of course, is one of those jobs.”

“Pink said research shows that people who hold jobs that require creativity and sophisticated problem-solving perform best when they have autonomy, an opportunity to master something and a sense of purpose…

“It’s not that money doesn’t matter,” Pink said. “It’s that the best use of money is to get people to stop thinking about money.”…

Superintendent Starr, Montgomery County said, “If politicians want to improve academic performance, they should “reduce teenage pregnancy, give excellent prenatal health care and provide universal preschool — and test scores will go up.”

See Washington Post, February 16, 2012,  Lyndsey Layton


Check this out! Entrepreneur Artfully Launches Self-Study

A site worth checking out by a very creative entrepreneur.

You will find Mona’s work inspiring as you launch your own self-study innovations for the new year!

Learn how professionals – outside of the teaching profession – are finding self-study useful in very practical ways.